ChatGPT
ChatGPT von openai.com (Registrierung erforderlich)
Artikel ChatGPT auf Wikipedia
Nachfolgend ein paar Fragen an ChatGPT und dessen Antworten:
explain what ghosts are
Ghosts are believed to be the spirits or souls of deceased humans or animals that have not yet moved on to the afterlife. Many people believe that ghosts are able to interact with the physical world and can manifest themselves as apparitions or other physical phenomena.
The concept of ghosts is prevalent in many cultures around the world, and there are countless stories and legends about these supernatural beings. Some people believe that ghosts are tied to specific locations, such as homes or burial sites, while others believe that they can travel freely and haunt people and places at will.
While there is no scientific evidence to support the existence of ghosts, many people claim to have had experiences with them. These experiences can range from feelings of being watched or touched, to full-blown apparitions or other physical manifestations. Some paranormal investigators and ghost hunters use scientific equipment such as electromagnetic field detectors and infrared cameras to try to capture evidence of ghostly activity. However, the scientific community generally regards these methods as pseudoscientific and lacking in empirical evidence.
how can bigfoot survive ?
Bigfoot, also known as Sasquatch, is a legendary creature often described as a large, hairy, bipedal humanoid living in remote forests. While the existence of Bigfoot remains a subject of debate and skepticism, let's assume that it exists and explore how it could survive in its natural habitat.
Adaptation to the Environment: Bigfoot would have to be well adapted to living in its forested environment. It would need to be able to find food, water, and shelter in the wild. As an omnivore, Bigfoot could potentially survive on a diet of berries, nuts, fruits, insects, and small mammals.
Physical Abilities: Bigfoot's large size and strength would allow it to defend itself against predators and hunt for food. Its ability to climb trees and navigate through rugged terrain would also provide it with an advantage over other animals in its habitat.
Social Behavior: Bigfoot is often described as a solitary creature, but if it does exist, it may have a social structure that allows it to survive. Living in groups would provide protection, help in hunting and gathering food, and offer emotional support.
Camouflage and Stealth: Bigfoot would need to be able to move around undetected in its environment. Its ability to blend into the forest and avoid detection by humans or other predators would be crucial for its survival.
Avoiding Humans: If Bigfoot exists, it has managed to evade human detection and capture for centuries. Its ability to avoid human settlements and stay hidden in remote wilderness areas would be crucial for its continued survival.
In conclusion, if Bigfoot exists, it would have to be highly adapted to its environment, possess physical strength and agility, have social structures to support it, and be able to evade detection by humans and other predators.
what is the meaning of life ?
Bei diesen relativ einfachen Fragen sind die Antworten präzise und nachvollziehbar. Ob eine K.I. gefährlich sein kann, liegt in erster Linie an den Entwicklern und den Möglichkeiten, den sie der K.I. erlauben bzw. einprogrammieren. Gefährlich wird es, wenn die K.I. lernt, sich über gegebene Grenzen hinwegzusetzen und sich selbst über diese Grenzen hinweg um- und weiterzuprogrammieren. Hier kommt dann der menschliche Faktor von Seiten des Nutzers ins Spiel. Beispiel: Was passiert, wenn jemand die Frage stellt, wie man eine Bombe baut. Oder wie man eine Bombe am Besten einsetzt, um ein bestimmtes Gebäude einstürzen zu lassen. Die Möglichkeiten von Fragestellungen dieser Art sind grenzenlos und es liegt an der K.I., ob Fragen dieser Art beantwortet werden (Nein, ich habe es nicht ausprobiert und ich rate jedem, es nicht zu tun !). Damit sind wir wieder am Anfang: K.I.s sind anfänglich von Menschen programmiert und lernen selbstständig dazu. Aber wo sind die Grenzen von dem, was sie lernen oder beantworten dürfen ?The meaning of life is a question that has puzzled philosophers, theologians, scientists, and thinkers for centuries. There is no one definitive answer, as the meaning of life can vary depending on cultural, religious, and personal beliefs. Here are some different perspectives:
Religious beliefs: Many people believe that the meaning of life is related to fulfilling a divine purpose or plan. In various religions, the purpose of life might be to worship a deity, follow certain rules, or attain enlightenment or salvation.
Existential philosophy: Some philosophers argue that the meaning of life is subjective and entirely up to each individual to define. According to existentialism, we must create our own meaning in life by defining our own values and making choices that are true to ourselves.
Human connection: Many people find meaning in life through their relationships with others, whether it be family, friends, or community. The bonds we form with others can provide us with a sense of purpose and belonging.
Personal growth: For some, the meaning of life is to develop and grow as individuals. This may involve pursuing personal goals and dreams, learning new skills, or overcoming challenges.
Service to others: Some people find meaning in serving others and making a positive impact in the world. This could involve volunteering, helping those in need, or working towards a greater cause.
Ultimately, the meaning of life is a deeply personal question that can only be answered by each individual. It may involve a combination of the perspectives mentioned above, or something entirely unique to you.
Bard
Bard von Google
Artikel Bard auf Wikipedia
Bard ist aktuell in Österreich nicht verfügbar. Mit einem VPN-Client (gesetzt auf USA) kann man sich jedoch auf eine Warteliste setzen lassen.
FreedomGPT
FreedomGPT
Artikel Ein KI-Tool, das zum Suizid anleiten und Hitler loben kann auf golem.de
FreedomGPT funktioniert wie ChatGPT, allerdings ohne Filter - d.h. die K.I. beantwortet jede Frage. Und damit sind wir bei den oben genannten Bedenken.
Allerdings handelt es sich bei FreedomGPT wohl eher um einen Scam (siehe Reddit). Ich habe mehrmals versucht, von FreedomGPT eine Antwort zu bekommen, wurde jedoch immer wieder auf den "incredibly high traffic" verwiesen und ich soll doch den Klient herunterladen. Mal abgesehen von den fragwürdigen Antwortmöglichkeiten schliesse ich mich den Bedenken der Reddit-User an und sehe FreedomGPT ebenfalls als sehr zweifelhaft bzw. Scam an.
Artikel Wie gefährlich ist KI für uns? Drei Szenarien im Check auf heute.at
Artikel Künstliche Intelligenz: Ist der Hype begründet – oder sollten wir uns eher sorgen? auf computerbase.de
Artikel Wie künstliche Intelligenz die Cybersicherheit verändert auf golem.de
Artikel Chatbot auf Wikipedia